
According to a Business Risk Survey, 28% of decision-makers report that the number of critical risk events has increased within their organizations. This highlights the need for you to thoroughly examine your business environment and develop effective risk mitigation strategies.
But what happens when you fail to revise your mitigation measures? It results in disasters similar to the Fukushima nuclear accident. A consequence of TEPCO’s continuous ignorance of advice from the government and stakeholders to revamp their safety protocols. Not only did it seriously damage the company’s reputation, but it also led to a complete shutdown of its power plant.
With the help of this article, we learn what a mitigation strategy is, its types, and common mistakes that you should avoid when implementing them.
What is a Mitigation Strategy?
Mitigation strategies are the plans and protocols implemented within the organization to protect it from threats that could disrupt its operations, cause financial losses, damage its reputation and result in legal penalties. It involves four common practices: risk acceptance, avoidance, transfer or reduction.
To build your risk mitigation strategies, you must identify areas of risk in your organization, evaluate their impact and monitor for changes that disrupt their effectiveness.
How to Implement a Mitigation Strategy
The successful implementation of mitigation measures involves the following steps:
Identifying Risks
The first and foremost task is to examine your business processes and identify all the risks that threaten them. These risks can be machinery failure, safety hazards, market fluctuations, regulatory shifts or natural disasters. Communicate with your stakeholders and employees to better understand the potential risks and carefully document them.
Assessing Impact
Once the risks have been identified, assess the impact they will have on your organization and what is the likelihood of their occurrence. Your evaluation criteria can include quantitative and qualitative methods or using a risk matrix. This helps determine which risks should be given priority and how resources will be allocated to mitigate them.
Developing Mitigation Strategies
After identifying the risks and their impacts, develop the mitigation strategy and action plans based on the organization’s risk threshold. This would include determining which risks must be avoided or reduced, and which should be accepted or transferred to a third party.
Monitoring Continuously
Risk mitigation is not a one-time thing. As new threats emerge, the action plans for tackling them also need to change. This brings forth the importance of continually assessing your risk environment and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation measures. Conducting internal audits and tracking incidents and near misses helps monitor these threats.
Types of Mitigation Strategies
There are four common risk mitigation strategies. These are:
Risk Avoidance
Risk avoidance is the practice of steering clear of activities and situations that bring harm to the business. This is usually practiced when risks pose a considerable threat to the organization, but the costs of mitigation efforts exceed the benefits reaped from eliminating them.
Risk Reduction
This strategy involves implementing processes and control measures to reduce the likelihood and impact of the risks. Using firewalls for protecting data systems or protective equipment for doing hazardous work are some examples of risk reduction.
Risk Transfer
Risk transfer involves shifting the liability of the risk to a third party. This includes buying insurance or outsourcing certain processes to another company.
Risk Acceptance
There are some threats that cannot be avoided or have very low consequences. In these cases, it is better to accept the risks but keep an eye out for future opportunities to mitigate them.
Common Mistakes in Mitigation Strategy
To ensure effective risk management, here are some common mistakes that you must avoid.

Inadequate Assessment
All the internal and external factors that pose operational, financial, reputational or compliance risks to the organization must be properly identified and evaluated. Overlooking or underestimating these risks leads to ineffective implementation of mitigation plans.
Not Involving Employees
You can use the best techniques for risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, but some insights about risks can only be gained by taking inputs from employees who are involved in the risk environment.
Ignoring Monitoring Need
Risk scenarios keep on changing. It can be due to changes in business operations, fluctuations in the market or updates in laws and regulations governing your industry. By ignoring the need for continuous monitoring, you leave your business vulnerable to threats that can damage your operations, finances or reputation.
Lack of Communication
Not having clear communication channels in your organization hinders its ability to inform employees and stakeholders about the potential risks and the mitigation plans being used. It also makes it difficult for employees to inform you of any emerging risk within the organizations.
Insufficient Documentation
The risks you have identified, their impact evaluation, mitigation plans and the cases of accidents due to these risks, all need to be properly documented to help you make better decisions. It also serves as proof of compliance with laws and regulations that concern your business. With insufficient documentation, you not only make risk mitigation difficult but also expose yourself to legal scrutiny.
Best Practices for Mitigation Strategy
Make use of these best practices to build a robust risk mitigation system:

Get different perspectives
To best understand the risks in your organization, get stakeholder and employee perspectives on risks. This helps in making effective mitigation policies.
Assign roles and responsibilities
Different risks concern different areas of your business. Rather than depending on one person for risk evaluation and mitigation, assign roles and responsibilities to different members based on expertise and authority. Start by clearly defining who will conduct risk assessment, who will formulate mitigation strategies, who will document the processes and who will monitor for emerging risk.
Conduct regular training
Regularly train your employees and stakeholders about the risks, safety protocols, industry policies and emergency response to any threat.
Proactively assess risks
Conduct regular inspections to identify emerging threats and assess the effectiveness of current mitigation policies. This enables you to update your mitigation strategy as needed.
Make use of technology
A consistent problem in risk mitigation is the time and errors involved in the manual process. A software for risk management automates risk identification and developing mitigation strategies. It even helps you schedule regular inspections and keeps documentation of the whole process in a centralized repository.
Summing up
Risks and opportunities are present in every nook and corner of a business. How you tackle threats and capture avenues for growth determines the profitability, stability and success of your organization. When given the chance to enhance your risk management, make sure you take it and automate the entire process with Effivity’s Safety modules.
Effivity is cloud-based compliance management software that provides you a systematic framework for risk evaluation and mitigation strategy. It automates identifying risks, their source and generating action plans for their mitigation. It even helps you regularly review risks and opportunities in your business.
Book a free trial with Effivity and streamline your risk mitigation efforts!